- Nov 09, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
-
- Nov 08, 2015
-
-
Jeroen F.J. Laros authored
-
- Nov 05, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
We forgot to include the description extractor in the totals. Also, it said batch jobs were excluded from the totals, which is not the case.
-
- Nov 04, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
-
- Nov 03, 2015
- Nov 02, 2015
- Oct 26, 2015
-
-
-
Vermaat authored
-
- Sep 24, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
-
- Sep 23, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
The alternative variant protein sequence translated from a non-reference start codon (created by the variant), was not color-diffed as normal variant protein sequences are. In the process we also rename the `oldprotein` and `newprotein` fields in the output object to `oldProtein` and `newProtein` to be more consistent with other field names.
-
- Jul 09, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
-
- Jul 03, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
-
- May 31, 2015
- May 26, 2015
- May 18, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
This is hopefully a temporary measure. At the moment we cannot accurately predict the running time of the extractor, so we have to aggressively limit the input based on the worst-case expectation. As a worst-case scenario, we currently use random input sequences, where length 1000bp yields about 500ms of running time. In the future we hope to either: 1. Predict the running time and abort if needed. 2. Keep track of the running time and abort if needed. 3. Run the extractor in a task scheduler with a running time limit.
-
Vermaat authored
-
We can now compare two sequences by supplying their sequence strings, accession numbers, or uploaded file.
-
- May 01, 2015
- Apr 30, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
This is a work in progress as there still seem to be some bugs. For example, some unit tests fail due to incorrect descriptions generated and others fail due to a crash.
-
- Feb 10, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
Fixes #24
-
- Jan 09, 2015
-
-
Vermaat authored
-
- Dec 08, 2014
- Nov 24, 2014