Omitted position numbering scheme prefix is only allowed on EST reference
Created by: mutalyzerbot
Original ticket: https://humgenprojects.lumc.nl/trac/mutalyzer/ticket/50 Original date: 2011/04/04 Original reporter: m DOT vermaat DOT hg AND lumc DOT nl
Currently, absence of prefix is interpreted as g. (or n.) positioning, without warning.
Examples: AB026906.1:274G>T, NM_000143.3:1del
We should abort and issue an error message. Preferably also suggest what the prefix should be.
See also the 1.0.4 name checker error message.