Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in
Toggle navigation
B
bbmri2
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Incidents
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Laros
bbmri2
Commits
3487a4a3
Commit
3487a4a3
authored
Jun 20, 2017
by
Laros
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Update notes_2017_06_20.md
parent
9de1f8bc
Changes
2
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
2 changed files
with
34 additions
and
29 deletions
+34
-29
notes/wd/notes_2017_06_06.md
notes/wd/notes_2017_06_06.md
+0
-29
notes/wd/notes_2017_06_20.md
notes/wd/notes_2017_06_20.md
+34
-0
No files found.
notes/wd/notes_2017_06_06.md
deleted
100644 → 0
View file @
9de1f8bc
# Work discussion 06-06-2017
Present: Jonathan Vis (JV), Jeroen Laros (JL),
Rowan Kanninga (RK), Leon Mei (LM), Mark Santcroos (MS).
## GoNL re-analysis
-
Issues with pipeline settings, have been resolved now.
-
Documenting the actual versions of the tools that are used; the
headers/footers (backend specific code) are obscuring the logic.
-
Testing on chr Y (genome in a bottle).
-
Re-run GIAB sample (started).
-
No X11 on shark for QC output (LM looks it to this).
## eLAN
Resolved.
## CoManage
-
MS: waiting on Surf for the implementation of a secure transport mechanism.
-
PN: what about robustness; no concerns at the moment.
-
MS: Leiden does not have a test IDP.
-
MS: will ask Surf about progress.
-
JL: do we need a test IDP? PN: likes to see the integration with surf connext;
MS: IDP will not be the main issue, the workflow is the main issue.
-
PN likes to have a roadmap from Surf; (JL and) PN will draft an e-mail.
## Ansible and Easybuild integration
-
PN made an idempotent playbook, checking handlers now; progress is slow.
-
PN playbook is ok, but could be improved upon.
-
Playbook is on GitHub: https://github.com/bbmri-nl/bbmri-nl-pipeline-deployment.
notes/wd/notes_2017_06_20.md
0 → 100644
View file @
3487a4a3
# Work discussion 20-06-2017
Present: Jonathan Vis (JV), Jeroen Laros (JL), Pieter Neerincx,
Roan Kanninga (RK), Gerben van der Vries GV, Leon Mei (LM),
Mark Santcroos (MS).
## GoNL re-analysis
-
Test runs on different clusters using different frameworks.
-
Discrepancies in the results, mainly related to read groups.
-
Cause seem to be the sample sheet, conversion to Molgenis format failed.
-
LM proposes to move on with the analysis, dropping the Molgenis framework.
-
JL proposes to start with BioPet, giving Groningen the time to fix the
problems. Once everything is working, the Groningen pipeline can be used as
well.
-
RK and GV will review the dry-run logs of BioPet. LM will also give a log of
a real run.
-
No X11 on shark for QC output (LM looks in to this).
## eLAN
Resolved.
## CoManage
-
MS: TLS is reported to be working.
-
MS: LDAPS functionality will be offered.
-
PN asked about the roadmap from Surf, Irene asked about extra funding. We
agree that apart from the POC, the funding should come from NFU / SURF.
## Ansible and Easybuild integration
-
PN: Improvement of the playbook is still on the list. No updates because of
all the work on GoNL.
-
Playbook is on GitHub: https://github.com/bbmri-nl/bbmri-nl-pipeline-deployment.
## Other
-
On 23-06-2017 there will be a hands on session on Easybuild / Ansible.
\ No newline at end of file
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment